I think the biggest things are around funding and capacity. About 30% to 40% of Agriculture Canada researchers are set to retire in the next three years. You don't just hand over those programs. You need to ensure there is a transition and training. These things represent lifetime careers, and that is of concern to our industry. We need to ensure there are people in those seats before the other people retire, in order to ensure continuity, because we have that reputation.
I also think programming for things like the science clusters is fundamentally important, but we can't have year-long gaps in funding; we need to ensure continuous funding. We've built huge programs that are doing phenomenal things for our industry and for public confidence, and the biggest detriment to them is having gaps in terms of funding, which means that post-docs leave, students leave, and those types of things.