Thank you. Perhaps I can take that.
The international standard is actually quite good. The problem is uptake. Not all jurisdictions are ready to apply the international guidance in terms of safety assessment to these products in terms of GM animals.
The standard is there. I think we and our colleagues in the U.S. have demonstrated that in using that standard you can reach a conclusion informed by the science. The reality is that just having a Codex standard doesn't mean that countries automatically adopt it.
It come back to the point that Andrea made in terms of that level playing field. We don't currently have it in the international context, and this isn't just for GM animals. The same applies for GM plants. There are many jurisdictions that are not yet at a stage where they are prepared to deliver approvals on a prompt basis and, in some cases, are not prepared to consider GM products at all at this stage.
On the development from a regulatory perspective, because Canada has the benefit of having had the years of experience that Karen pointed to, we've also been active in sharing that experience with other jurisdictions in terms of helping them build the technical capacity to carry out safety assessments.