What we heard from regulators was an implication that the regulators are performing the function of peer review in the absence of peer review. What's happening is that corporations are providing data packages to Canadian regulators. Those data packages are kept as confidential business information. They're not available to the public. That equally means it's not peer-reviewed science. There are some exceptions with one or two studies.
Systemically, the lack of transparency in Canadian regulation is also attached to this question of whose science it is and whether that science is peer-reviewed.