It has implications on a number of levels. In the United States, this was approved for human consumption. I believe Senator Murkowski, who is a pretty fierce defender of the Alaskan salmon fishing industry, came out swinging and said that we have to hit the pause button because right now there will be consumer confusion. They won't know. If it's not labelled, then it's not distinguished. Then some people are going to.... They received over a million comments, I think, in consultations in the U.S. People care about this.
From an economic standpoint, those who sell salmon are concerned about confusion and about consumers turning away from salmon altogether.
This is a big step. It has implications. We're going to see other fish. We might see insects. We might see birds. We might see trees. If you care about nature, there are implications. For the government not to do any public consultation at all, be it with stakeholders like the commercial fishery or others, is going to have implications for the commercial fishing industry long term, not right now. I think it's wrong that there haven't been consultations.
I don't want to be too much like a preacher, but I think a mistake has been made and I would encourage the government to rectify it.