Yes, and there has been some progress made in that. The CFIA and the market access secretariat are working together to make that process more transparent and to allow industry to participate more in those discussions, because, for the most part, they have been very much happening. The equivalency agreements are happening behind closed doors, so industry has not participated. The equivalency agreements are complicated. Oftentimes not all of the products qualify for the equivalency.
With every different country, there's sort of a different equivalency agreement and it makes it a bit complicated. For that reason, it's imperative that our industry be consulted on those agreements. Up and coming right now is Mexico and, it looks like, South Korea. So it's necessary to hold the CFIA and the market access secretariat to those promises to engage industries so that we can negotiate fairer organic equivalency agreements.
The U.S. one is particularly problematic, and we could submit some very detailed comments about what needs to be rectified there.