It's good to hear you're a fan of turkey. We're always looking for those. I didn't think I would come and get recipes, but that's also a bonus. This committee is squarely on the ball.
In all seriousness, though, thank you for the question. Interestingly enough, we're partnered today with DFC because in the context, not of CETA but TPP, we have more in common with them than we do with our other feathered friends because of the impact. That is basically because of the structure of our market.
As I indicated very briefly in my presentation, our market is driven really on the white meat market, the breast meat. That is literally all that comes in across the border. It just displaces the rest of the bird, to put it in elementary terms. You can't just grow the breast meat. That poses a huge issue to us in displacement.
The access will be up about 71% over the totality of the 10 years when it comes to its full fruition, if it is signed and implemented. It's a significant hit for the turkey farmers of Canada. When you talk about compensation, we have lots of questions. As Caroline indicated before, we're sort of just wondering at this point what that's going to look like.
We, being in supply management, would still prefer to get our dollars and our livelihood from the marketplace. We stand firmly behind that. Having said that, if part of your market has been undermined through this, then of course you're looking for compensation. We do not see it as a subsidy, but squarely as compensation for lost market in order to rebuild and continue to invest.
On CETA specifically, it's not really an issue for the poultry industry. I'll just speak for turkey and in general for the poultry industry. Because they're both high-value markets, it's really a net zero game. It's really dairy, as everybody knows, that has had issues, but we still share their concerns because it sets that precedent. We saw that unfold in the TPP shortly thereafter.
As they do in dairy, we support trade. We're not anti-trade, as has been indicated sometimes in the press. We get a lot of bad press in supply management. I don't know why. I might be biased.
Really, it comes down to the fact that we have a very strong system here in supply management, in poultry and in the dairy sector, and that has to be maintained. It has an ability to contribute to the rural fabric of this country and to the small towns, which we know are under pressure and struggle now, especially with an economy that is basically a little flat over a few years. The projected outlook is not as rosy as people would hope. Supply management becomes more of an integral part of rural Canada.