Yes.
I definitely think it should be included in the framework. The challenge, obviously, with many international countries—I can rhyme off a few, the U.S., Russia, China—is that despite what would be a ruling by WTO or something, they either don't acknowledge that ruling or they work to extend whatever policy they've put in place for as long as they possibly can, such as in the case of COOL.
The challenge for us as a country that's so heavily dependent upon exports is that the damage is done by the time we finally get resolution. With COOL, you can say we won victory, but it nearly took a decade to claim that victory and to get our market access back. In the livestock industry in Canada, on pork and beef, animals really flow back and forth. They had probably knocked that industry down by 50% to 60% by the time we finally won that ruling, and there's no compensation in the meantime for those people who have gone out of business because their model of accessing some of these markets has disappeared.
So that's the biggest challenge. It's a great opportunity to export, it provides growth opportunities, but when an export market gets shut down, depending on its impact within the sector, the effect can be long-lasting. Whatever conditions could be included to help during those periods of time would also be very helpful.