On the recommendations, I'm pleased that they are a priority in that Calgary statement. The only recommendation I have is to proceed on the basis of regulation, which follows from adequate and good testing.
The problem that Mr. Shipley alluded to before is that the natural world is so complicated that it's really hard to test for everything that needs to be tested for. As testing evolves and gets better, and as different parts of the system are tested, we learn new information each time.
My only recommendation is to prioritize the environment in a natural world, spend the money there properly, and not get dragged into defending some sort of chemical or business farming model that is better left up to others to promote and defend their own products. Do not to get dragged down to a place where government money is being used to defend something that later turns out to be a mistake.