I would first like to clarify that there have not been cuts as such. The federal government, together with all the provinces and territories, decided to change the parameters of our business risk management programs.
Since I want to provide you with details, I would like to make sure I don't make mistakes, so I will continue in English.
The governments together decided to change les paramètres de ses programmes since there was a conscious decision in the context of Growing Forward 2 to rebalance the emphasis between business risk management and other programming offered through the Growing Forward 2 national policy framework. In that context, in the case of both AgriStability and AgriInvest, two key programs within the business risk management suite of programs, there was a decision to change the parameters of the programs. Again, that decision was made not solely by the federal government but by all of the governments implicated in Growing Forward 2. In that context, there was also a decision to make sure the business risk management suite of programs continued to move away from what we had previously or historically referred to as pure income support to programs that were really focused on helping producers deal with risks that were beyond their ability to manage.
In that context it was recognized that governments really had a role to play when there was extreme market volatility and the industry faced significant risks, and therefore some of the parameters were changed. Those parameter changes allowed for increased investment, for example, in the cost-shared strategic initiatives programming.
I am not sure which program the numbers you're quoting would relate to.