That's interesting. Does it fall under WTO in terms of the WTO providing predictable science-based trade rules regarding export? This maybe wasn't under NAFTA. This was a U.S. farm bill, and yet it affected a NAFTA partner. It wasn't necessarily science-based, as far as we knew, yet when we were in the United States, we found out that consumer groups, ranchers, truckers, and processors supported our position and not that of the appellant.
It took a long time. It cost our producers billions of dollars. My concern is that we lose some faith in the ability to deal with scientific issues, which I think Canada bases itself on. Our pork and beef industries were dramatically affected. How do we improve that relationship and get respect for our science-based products that are going to our largest trading neighbour?