Actually, I think your summary of the data said that there's no exceedance of the acute freshwater invertebrate end point, and there are very few exceedances, I think maybe one, of any kind of chronic end point. Despite that, you're saying you're going to use that as data to encourage the cancellation of the agricultural uses across the country of that product. Why would the other neonics expect to be treated any differently?
On March 7th, 2017. See this statement in context.