We find ourselves in a situation whereby you're saying you're relying on science, but the science that we've been looking at says there's no direct correlation with bee kills. You're saying you're doing some other work on that. Science doesn't indicate that there's any permanent impact on water species at this point. There doesn't seem to be much information on that or whatever, yet your decision is that you're still going to ban these chemicals.
I don't see that this decision is being based on science the way it should be. I think producers out there are feeling the same way. You excluded the industry and agriculture from the discussions until you made your decision. I don't think that's a solid scientific approach to a subject or to a decision.
I've been here long enough. We've had some PMRA battles over the years, and I'm wondering what you can do to reassure us that you're paying attention to the agricultural community on these issues in ways that weren't the case in the past.