Everything looks as if your proposed decision is just based on some hypothetical risk to a couple of aquatic species. Do you have any real-world data to indicate that the species are actually being adversely impacted?
When I look at the studies, they indicate that the levels go up in the springtime and the levels drop off in the fall—which is exactly what we would expect—and that the levels are consistently below the threshold of where there is going to be a long-term problem.
You seem to believe there's something else going on here. Do you have any real-world data to back that up?