But just a minute. You left them out of this discussion until after you had already made the decision. Why was there a lack of transparency and accountability in the whole process here, if you say it's the registrant's responsibility to provide you with the data?
We don't hear anything to say that there was general consultation here. Basically, this was driven by the agency. There were arbitrary timelines put on it. There wasn't a general discussion. You said that you used widespread data, but it doesn't appear that's the case here.
There's a decision that has been made that looks like it's political, not scientific. I'm just wondering why it was done in the way it was, basically leaving the industry outside and environmental groups outside, everybody outside of that decision before—