Certainly. As with our comments on the conditionally registered pesticides, I think that's at the heart of that issue. There was a perception that when we approve a pesticide and give it a conditional registration, there is somehow information missing or data gaps, or there's a lot of uncertainty remaining. But as I indicated earlier, when we do make a risk assessment decision, we make sure that we're satisfied, we're confident, that the long-term risks will be acceptable for people and the environment.
We don't believe there was any different assessment at the time. We registered the neonics for the first time, by and large, based on all the available information that we had. We believed that the human and environmental health risks of the neonics would not be unacceptable, and we made a decision on that basis.