With respect to the water monitoring data, all the water monitoring data was considered. We received quite an extensive amount from across the country, more than we would normally have for a normal re-evaluation. Much of the information was lacking what we call ancillary data, which is data about where the site was, what was cropped around it, and whether the pesticide was used in those areas, so that information is of limited use in making a risk assessment decision.
The areas where we do have robust monitoring data include the Morrissey study as well as work that was done by Environment Canada in Ontario and the province of Quebec. Those sites have information about what was cropped there. Those sites had regular monitoring over the course of several years. In Ontario and Quebec, those sites indicated there were levels that were of concern to us.