I guess I have just one thing to add. I will confirm that the David Suzuki Foundation and Équiterre have prepared joint comments on this particular decision and will submit them by the March 23 deadline. We would have been happy to submit them by the February 23 deadline as well.
As Annie indicated, we do have some thoughts on strengthening the process at the PMRA, but I do want to tackle the suggestion here, or offer another perspective on the suggestion that this decision has come out of the blue and took registrants and growers by surprise. The PMRA does publish a work plan for its re-evaluations of pesticides. The cyclical re-evaluation of pesticides is required by law, so the information was available on the timing of this re-evaluation and shouldn't have been a surprise, and I wouldn't have thought there was anything preventing—