Okay, thanks.
I have spoken to the researchers at the University of Guelph and I've spoken to some of the industry reps, and they were concerned that they weren't involved in the process. It sounds as if there is a new process that's being introduced, and maybe that's something that might find its way into our discussion as we review our testimony to see what we can recommend going forward.
We're acting as members of Parliament, trying to represent ideas as best we can, trying to get as much balance as possible into our conversations, but sometimes we see these wildly divergent pieces of information. For example, the HFFA research that was released from the EU in January indicated that after two years of banning neonics in the EU, 912,000 tonnes of oilseed would have to be produced somewhere else in the market because of diminishing yields.
Ms. Bérubé, you mentioned that in your research, there wasn't a change in yields. What we've heard is that there is up to a 30% change in yields between using treated versus non-treated seeds. How do we—