We want to have science-based regulations. You've all talked about the interest in outcome-based and science-based regulations. Also, the CFIA has expressed a desire to better align with the standards of Canada's trading partners. I'm just wondering if you can give me a little information. What happens if those two things are not the same, and their standards are not based on science but on politics? How do we deal with that? That seems to be what's happening here. The idea that we would have European standards is in a lot of ways ridiculous because of the complete difference in geography, transport issues, and those kinds of things. Does anybody have a comment on that?
Go ahead, Mike.