Thank you for the question. Certainly in CAFTA's membership, we have producers of beef, pork, many different meats, grains, and oilseeds, some of which would be organic as well. I don't speak specifically for the organic association, but certainly farmers have an interest in providing what the market is interested in and what the market is willing to reward them for either growing or producing, in the case of livestock.
What I know about China, and certainly about CAFTA's members' interest in China when it comes to potential free trade negotiations, is the importance of establishing those terms of trade that enable us to take advantage of opportunities. As you mentioned, organic certification is one of those regulations we would need to meet to expand our growth there.
When we see the opportunity in China, it's very much a priority for our membership to be prepared to send product to that market by having our regulations match or having agreements that allow us to access those markets. In the case of organics, as you describe, it's about that certification, and about the recognition and validity of that certification.
Equally, it's the things that Martin was describing in his presentation. Let's take canola as an example. We need our canola oil to have the required health certification when it reaches Chinese soil, for example. That requires that our regulatory agencies talk to each other. There are many different examples in food and agriculture where it's a highly regulated sector and we need those close regulator-to-regulator ties. Organic is a good example where, if there's an opportunity to meet that, we need to have that alignment between regulators in our countries.