I want to add something.
One of the merits of NAFTA has been that it has brought governments together, both Canada and the U.S. Usually, there are areas where things get contentious and there are disagreements. However, moving forward and while trade agreements are helpful and positive and whatnot, it's efforts to try to maintain that working relationship where new trade agreements have been signed or existing ones.... There has been the Regulatory Cooperation Council established in the past. That model can evolve to a regulatory co-operation committee or whatnot, but the premise of that concept has merit moving forward, not only between Canada and the U.S., but perhaps Canada and the EU or other key markets. What that does is it encourages and, frankly, forces the industry to consider what its priorities are—I should add, what realistic priorities they have—and also government officials in the departments to bring some attention to that.
At a time when, frankly, whether it's CFIA or other agencies, they have no shortage of demands or expectations to deliver something from industry, as well as governments, the mechanism of having a structured discussion beforehand within the country among stakeholders and then encouraging that with other countries is something that should be facilitated moving forward.