Yes. I'm not a scientist, and we've actually spoken with PMRA about this. My understanding is that when it comes to especially a pesticide, a hazard-based assessment is sort of the beginning stages of what a risk-based assessment is. Hazard will look at a potential product, its profile, and whether there is a potential hazard there. If there is, then the EU often takes action. But in Canada, if it's identified as a hazard, then you get on to the risk, and you identify how the product is used, whether there are ways to mitigate it, and what levels are being used.
In my layman's opinion, risk is taking hazard to the full extent. If there's a hazard, we need to take action. Risk is like, there's a hazard, but you're only ever going to be in contact with parts per billion, and there are ways to mitigate that, including through personal protection equipment. That's our concern, that it's not as nuanced or as fulsome an evaluation.