No, on Going Forward 3. On TPP, in the spirit of not doubling our work with the committee on international trade, perhaps what we can do is coordinate this with international trade and make sure we don't invite the same witnesses out of respect for the agricultural community.
Also, and I'm not sure if this was done in the past, perhaps rather than writing a report we could actually write a letter to the committee of international trade stating here's what we've heard, here's what we think you should do based on agriculture, as opposed to writing another report when international trade might have heard other news from the agricultural community, because they are going to hear from the agricultural community.
I'm afraid that we're doubling our work with TPP. There was a study done by the agriculture committee on TPP prior. We weren't there, but there was a study done on it. How many studies can we do on TPP?
I agree that we maybe should hear from witnesses, but perhaps we could write a letter to the committee on international trade based on what we've heard, if we're just going to do four meetings. I'm not comfortable writing a report based on four meetings. I don't think we can tell Canadians that we've done a good job based on four committee meetings.