The starting point for the federal government is a question of constitutional authority to intervene in land-use planning. There are definitely constitutional limitations that are set on the federal government in terms of what it can do.
Setting that aside, from my view, the position I presented was that a serious problem is that we don't have consistent land-use planning or levels of farmland protection. So the primary role and contribution that I would set forward for the federal government in terms of the role it can play that doesn't step into that constitutional realm is to engage in agreements. That starts with a policy statement that protecting farmland is important, and then keeping and maintaining that and holding it as a principle for agreements like the Growing Forward agreement and the national food policy.