Let me explain this. First of all, food production basically makes more and more available food, but this food is not accessible. According to FAO—there is a kind of calculation because of climate change—we need 50% more food, but this doesn't mean that we are really dealing with hunger and malnutrition. You can have even more wheat, more corn, more rice, which is more than 60% or 70% of the agricultural production, but this doesn't mean that this food goes to the people, or that it's accessible, actually healthy, or affordable. GMO has a certain kind of role. This is acceptable, but GMO basically is used for maize or more soy, which is animal food—and also some other foods too.
There is a claim that GMO will sort of solve the problem of climate change, but so far there is no significant scientific data about it. More production is good, but it's not going to help us because it will not be sustainable. GMO means you have to use certain kinds of pesticides, which are systemic pesticides, which over the years make the soil much more tired and cause it to lose the major minerals. Sustainable agriculture is certainly not going to use GMO.