It's going to be hard enough in English.
I did not mention GMO in my presentation, but thank you for the question. The work we do in our breeding is not GMO as defined by most groups. I don't have the definition off the top of my head, but I can tell you what we do. In an organism, there is the genome, which is the entire sequence of the DNA. It's the entire genetic code of the organism, and what we've been able to do in the scientific community with our genomics people is to look for markers, meaning the genes or usually a series of base codes on the long strand of DNA marking an association with a trait that we're looking for. The trait could be resilience to drought or resilience to flooding or resilience to a fungus or whatever, and that trait, for whatever reason, is not expressed. There are ways of using viruses to express the DNA that's already in the naturally occurring plant. By doing that, we are able to express the gene that has been suppressed.
Generally I would consider GMO as something that takes DNA from a different type of organism and puts it into another. This is not that. You're dealing with the existing strand of DNA. By doing that, we are able to speed up the selection process for plants by half, so it will take half as long to get the varieties we want.