The way I look at it is that it's like buying insurance as the house is burning down. Yes, you take a 20% cut, but.... I know it isn't exactly that way, but take a look at the process there. Your neighbour, who's been engaged and involved with this all the time.... AgriStability has its own nuances anyway. It's a case of being able to just jump in.
The costs I've seen in some of the other articles that are associated with it.... They're going to add some costs here and so on. It has to be paid for somewhere.
I appreciate getting the information on that. The farmers have always had to do a census, and they continue to do that. We continue to get phone calls constantly about what we've grown or the fertilizer that we use. That continues as it always has. I just want to make sure that everyone recognizes that part of it.
Mr. Graham, the discussions that you have with regard to the four Rs in the recommendations.... Again, farmers have been doing these kinds of things because it's important. It's like getting the information you need from Kansas on the weather. You're going to do what is needed in order to make sure that there is some margin of profit for you to be able to function. These are the sorts of things we're looking at.
The concept of the government making decisions on financial incentives means you have to build a bureaucracy in order to deal with that type of thing, whereas most farmers would say to just get out of their way and let them do what they need to do because they understand their circumstances.
What kinds of issues do you see as far as potential incentives?