I would say that the environmental farm plan has been a great success for agriculture, in general. From farm to farm, it's specific as to how the producers go through the process of looking at the land, their facilities, and whatnot, and look at where they can mitigate any environmental impact. That's overseen many times, by an expert or somebody more familiar, who can go farm to farm and help the producer maybe see something that they didn't recognize or didn't understand had an impact.
In our industry, there have been on-farm programs for probably the last 15 years. Cedric MacLeod, who is on the phone, has certainly helped deal with what are called shelterbelts. Cedric is more informed than I am. There have been trees placed next to the farms, which had benefit for two reasons. First, it helped with an odour issue, but it also helped with blockages of wind to prevent any soil erosion, in certain areas. Frankly, let's face it, croplands can be relatively flat and exposed to air and whatnot. That's only one area. There are opportunities where identifying wetlands or grassy areas next to waterways and appropriate setback from those rivers should be examined every five years.
In our industry and in some parts of Canada, I do know that they need to reinvest in their lagoons that store the manure product that comes from the farms. That's not insignificant, just due to construction. They maybe need to update it or upgrade it, but all this process would be recognized through the environmental farm plan when someone external comes in and reviews their operation.