Again, I would say it's a straightforward question, and the reply isn't always easy.
If I may, I'll just use an example. Whatever the country is, I want to export my greenhouse peppers. I'll put it in, and we will ask the other country to do it. One of the problems right now with the number of bilateral agreements that are being, if I may say, proliferated around the world, is that there's a capacity issue for many countries the same way there is for us.
Look at China. Everybody wants to export to China, but the Chinese have the capacity to do only so many risk assessments at any particular time. So for those peppers, they come back and say, “Mr. Gorrell, you know what, we'll get to those peppers after we do your blueberries, after we do your cherries, after we do your whatever,” and that is an issue, too. Part of the discussion is about the prioritization, having the candid conversation about what we can do on our side, but also on the other side.
To your question, yes, sometimes there will be, let's say, a less than honourable intent in the delay on it, but often there is a natural progression in the time it takes us. For example, with some of the non-tariff barriers and the access we've had with other countries, it is not unusual—and I'm almost apologetic about saying this—for it to take years in some cases to get things done. There are some less than honourable non-tariff barriers, but in many cases the capacity and the ability to get things done do take years.