Well, you're going to hear directly from one of our members after us. From our perspective, I think it's not so much that it's easier, it's that it's predictable.
Canada's system is world renowned. I want to make it clear, both on the pesticides and plant biotechnology, that it has served us very well. Canada is viewed very highly all around the world in terms of its decisions.
What we want to make sure, though, is that we continue to adapt. Especially on the plant biotech, we have brand new technology here that doesn't necessarily fit that cookie-cutter approach. We need some flexibility, and we need recognition from the regulators that they have a role to play in innovation. Yes, they're to protect health and environment. Of course, that's their primary mandate. But if we all want to strive to get Canadian agriculture exports to a bold new number, all of those technologies are going through the regulator first. Whether it's that seed, or what needs to be put on the seed to protect it, it all has to go through those regulators. If they are completely divorced from this broader goal of innovation and growing agriculture, they could easily stifle that.