I agree. We added that on because at our last meeting we were short on witnesses, and the discussion was that if it were going to go forward, that would give the analysts a chance to call the witnesses and organize a meeting. We've added some other themes that we may explore as we go on, but you're right that we don't know whether or not there will be more meetings.
To John's point, we don't want to corner ourselves with those themes. We are the masters of who we want to see and question. We probably need a motion to set the witnesses. I think it's prudent to have a motion, but Mr. Barlow and Mr. Blois, if you want to find a common path that we can put into that motion, that would be great and it would help the analysts to move forward and set up the other meetings.