We need that meeting to fulfill the six BRM meetings that we must hold to fulfill our motion on the BRM when it was first brought up.
Effectively, it would remove the August 5 meeting and then just push everything back. We'd be at an even stage, because we've replaced the August 5 meeting with June 23 from the original calendar.
Are we okay with that, with June 23 and we remove the August 5 meeting? That gives us a bit of a stretch there. We can't please everyone, but is that acceptable to all?