Canadian stakeholders would not generally engage with the committee. The committee is three parties to the agreement. It is the body where we meet to discuss issues related to the agricultural provisions that are contained in the agreement. Several improvements have been made, in my view, to the committee structure under CUSMA as compared to NAFTA, including for agriculture, where the agriculture committee will now be able to take into consideration work that happens in the three bilateral consultative committees on agriculture that exist outside the agreement.
There are a number of other institutional improvements, in my opinion. When Canada goes to these committee meetings, when we engage in any institutional body, in any FTA, we begin by consulting with our stakeholders on the issues that they would like us to raise and their view on the issues that are raised by our partners in that agreement. That would continue to be the case under the new structure.