I think it's important to understand that our industry is trilaterally integrated and is becoming more and more so. If you look at the greenhouse industry, for example, you see that we have a very significant industry here in Canada, and a lot of our greenhouse growers will have operations in the U.S. and perhaps in Mexico also.
For us it was important to continue the success of NAFTA as CUSMA, as we will call it. Hopefully, it will be implemented when it's ratified. We see this as just a continuation of what was already a very strong agreement. We were very happy not to see any seasonal provisions in there around anti-dumping and countervailing. As some of you are probably aware, that was a bit of a poison pill for the industry in terms of a relatively smaller pocket of the industry in the U.S. pushing for that, coming from USTR. We were glad that it did not make it into the final agreement.
Overall, we're very pleased with how it has developed. We work very closely with our colleagues, both in the U.S. and in Mexico. We took a very integrated approach to how we developed comments in all three countries and how we participated. Somebody referenced that there was a lot of participation in the negotiations, and we all took a very firm commitment to doing that.
We really see this as a trilateral agreement that's going to continue to benefit the industry. There's nothing we're concerned about at this point—except for the one thing that we won't get into. Some of you know, as you've heard lots of us talk about the PACA-like trust provision. But I won't talk about that today. No, I won't.
I don't know if my colleagues want to comment.