Great. Thank you.
Ms. Rosher, I'll turn to you for a second.
In its testimony earlier, the CFA mentioned the establishment of a technical working group. We've heard that sometimes the BRM suite of programs are not quick enough to adapt to the changing realities we see.
If we look at Growing Forward 1, Growing Forward 2 and the Canadian agricultural partnership, these are five-year programs, funding arrangements. Do you have any recommendations on what that technical working group would look like, and how can we construct these programs to be a bit more responsive in the future rather than relying on annual FPT meetings or the next policy framework coming into place?