Okay.
Here is the first motion:
That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee undertake a study on the issues faced by and impacts on the affected sectors (supply managed commodities under the last three free trade agreements, the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA)); and that it focus on those to which the government has not paid all due compensation.
The second motion is as follows:
That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee undertake a study with witnesses on the measures the Government of Canada could implement to recognize and fund agricultural practices that are beneficial in terms of the environment, land use, local economies and regional development, among others; and that the Committee report its recommendations to the House.
I believe that the second motion, in particular, may address the concerns of several members from a number of the various parties present.
The third motion simply asks that we do what we intended to do before prorogation.
Thank you.