Thank you, Mr. Finnigan, for the question.
My response was in my opening remarks. I will preface it by saying that it is complicated. It's not ever one thing, but surely, in terms of what I said in my opening remarks about the cumulative impact and the cumulative burden of regulation, from both a cost perspective and a time perspective—and also from a predictability perspective—all of us around this virtual table understand the business and understand that the number one thing for business is predictability and cost efficiency. That really is what it's about.
What I will say is that for all its good—and there's a lot of good—the not-so-good in our regulatory system is that it stymies investment. It creates barriers to predictability, barriers to innovation and barriers to cost efficiency that oftentimes far outweigh and even stymie the health and environmental positives that we are trying to gain.
While I won't speak to the specifics with regard to a specific decision of putting one plant in X instead of Y, I do think we should look to these types of examples, study them carefully and be very serious about thinking through our regulatory framework going forward, especially when we're talking about recovery, and especially when we're talking about scaling up our agriculture and agri-food sector going forward.