Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to our witnesses.
I'll start, perhaps, with Mr. King or someone from Environment.
When I look at the actual Bill C-206, it's relatively straightforward. It's just trying to amend the definition of qualifying farm fuel.
My understanding, when we look at the entire Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, is that there are definitions for eligible farming activity and also eligible farming machinery that qualify, which this particular bill does not address at all. Would it be your position that the challenge, despite the noble intent from Mr. Lawrence in relation to this bill, is flawed in the sense that it doesn't actually address the activities and the machinery that are perhaps needed to capture grain drying or the heating of barns and other facilities?