Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I think this is one area where the member's question gives us the concept that it would create some serious enforcement challenges for the CFIA.
The offence would be very difficult to prosecute, we think. The way the proposed amendment is worded would require the Crown to have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the trespasser understood the risk of disease transmission resulting from entering the premises, and deliberately acted in disregard of the knowledge, or was reckless in regard to that risk.
It is going to make it exceptionally hard to hold anyone accountable, as merely raising a reasonable doubt that the person knew or even suspected the risk would likely result in an acquittal.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.