Thank you.
My question is for Mr. Mathuik or Ms. Ireland.
Mr. Mathuik or Ms. Ireland, you talked about the requirements and the significant resources it takes to respond quickly. We also talked about partnering with local law enforcement. Can't we simply count on the police to demonstrate that the individuals in question penetrated the area where the animals were kept?
That's my first question. I think it's possible to do that.
You said it would be very difficult to prove the intent of the individuals. However, John Barlow, the sponsor of Bill C-205, told us such proof would not be necessary, as he understood the bill. He indicated that the individuals could be penalized simply for trespassing.
That brings me to my questions.
What is the real story?
If the offence is very difficult to prove, what changes need to be made to the bill?
The committee has the power to propose amendments to the bill. What changes would you suggest we make to lower the burden of proof?