Thank you.
Something else concerns me. I'd like to know your view on the proof requirement in relation to the incident.
Here's an example. Protesters show up on a farm, and livestock subsequently become sick. There was a highly publicized case involving a large hog farm in Quebec. The farm family incurred significant losses because animals fell ill. The protesters reportedly put water in the fuel tanks, causing damage. However, no one was able to prove that the two incidents were related.
Aren't we going to end up with the same problem if the legislation is enforced in a more systematic way?