I recognize that Mr. Barlow raised his hand, perhaps as a counter to Mr. MacGregor.
With regard to my question, Mr. Barlow mentioned whistle-blowers and the concern about restricting the ability for people, rightfully, to be able to call out poor practices on farm. So that I can understand the element he's raising, is it that the whistle-blowers in question would enter the farm without taking some measure of biosecurity before going on the said farm to report the poor behaviour?
In my mind, what Mr. MacGregor is proposing about all persons is that as long as those individuals followed the biosecurity protocol in place going into the particular entry of the building, as is being contemplated in the act, came back out and then reported, this wouldn't necessarily impugn the individual in question.
Can Mr. Barlow give me a bit more context, so I can understand his argument in that regard?
Thank you.