This is on whether the decision of the chair shall carry. Mr. Barlow would like to challenge the chair.
As I understand it, if you're voting in favour, it's to maintain the decision of the chair. If you're voting against, it's to overrule the procedural decision that I've given and to move on in a different direction.
Madam Clerk, I'll have you call the vote in favour of the chair or not.
(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 6; nays 5)
Ultimately, the chair's ruling is upheld by the committee.
Unfortunately, Mr. Barlow, your first amendment is inadmissible.
Colleagues, now that CPC-1 is ultimately defeated, CPC-4, CPC-5, CPC-6, CPC-8 and CPC-9 cannot be moved, as they are consequential to CPC-1. They are inadmissible.
Go ahead, Mr. Perron.