Thank you for your reply, Mr. Pierre‑Jean. It is clear.
I just want to make sure I understand this correctly. Are you saying that amendment BQ-3 is entirely unnecessary and that pilots would not be affected by the act, or should we change the way the amendment is worded?
I'll read it out again.
(5) A pilot in command of an aircraft with a horse on board in respect of which the chief officer of customs did not receive a copy of the declaration is not liable if they were authorized to take the aircraft on its flight.
Would it be wise to include this for the sake of clarity or do you think it is entirely unnecessary?