There are so many.
On one hand, there's the farmer-to-farmer learning that needs to happen. The government needs to support those types of exchanges, because farmers will only put in practice on their farms what they've seen works somewhere else. There are a lot of things we can do on the farm to scale up those practices.
At the same time, what we feel right now is lacking—and we are really appreciative of the study—is for the government to look at its programs and see where they can support and enhance the adoption of those practices. There are a lot of things that could be done with BRM—and again, I can circulate the study—through AgriStability, AgriInsurance and AgriInvest, small tweaks that could actually make sure that farmers are compensated for keeping grasslands intact and sequestering carbon and helping them when disaster strikes to retain more water, for instance, in their field, or when droughts and things like that happen.
I feel like I'm not answering fully, but there are so many things that can be done.