Just briefly to your point, Mr. Drouin, I think that is a progression in the technology, being able to use pelletization of wood. There is a carbon intensity that comes with that, too.
Previously, most biodigesters required farmers to take additional passes on their fields, take up that stubble and take up that extra material after harvest, which requires more passes burning gas or diesel. Then it requires, if that is not dry, to somehow be dried out. Then it also requires storage, which can lead to a fire hazard plus having the space.
We have heard qualitatively that to manage a biodigester might require hiring an additional hand, which again impacts your profitability and, again, could have a reverse effect if wood pelletization is scalable to get the necessary BTUs if you're doing more passes on the field with your tractor.
To your point, I think that speaks to an evolution of the technology, and that's why we want to see that continuum. The sustainability continuum is something we're very supportive of at ACA.