Thank you so much for the great question.
That was definitely [Technical difficulty—Editor] in regard to the 3-NOP cattle feed.
With respect to the actual difference in the approval process through Health Canada for it being considered a medication versus a cattle feed, our understanding is that the process does require a longer evaluation and more steps to go through in order for it to reach markets.
With respect to how that lines up with criteria for evaluating that difference in the EU, I think a little work has to possibly be done to look into why the EU may consider that classification to be quicker, more specific to cattle feed and more rapid in coming to market.
We do know, according to the Alberta study, that with different mixtures of cattle feed—whether it was mixed with corn feed or barley feed—you can get upwards of an 80% reduction in methane per cow, with usually a minimum of 30% reduction. That's obviously a very significant impact, especially with the increased recognition that methane has gotten over the last year under the IPCC reports.