The chair is going to exercise the right to ask a couple of questions, even if I draw a bit of ire from my colleagues.
The entire concept of what we're talking about here can cut both ways. If Canadian agriculture is properly accounted for in its environmental stewardship, it can be a trade advantage, but only if it is recognized in the international market.
My question would be perhaps for Ms. Govier or for you, Ms. Meltzer.
Who is taking the lead within the Government of Canada to engage with our international partners? I take notice that agriculture is not yet being contemplated for border adjustment mechanisms in the jurisdictions we've talked about. I guess that could be a concern that Mr. Barlow's highlighted or a competitive advantage to Canada, depending on how it's implemented, and a net benefit really depends on how we engage and inform about the evidence that we have in this country on this. We know that there are farmers in other jurisdictions, like Europe, who are saying that they want those mirror clauses, so you could see how agriculture could come down the line.
Who is taking the lead? Is that a GAC lead, is that the Department of Finance or ECCC? How are we engaging? That would be my question.