It's a great question.
I hadn't really thought of it as food security, because we're awash in food. From a canola perspective, we grow way more than we consume domestically, so if food security is domestic, we're good. If food security is more global, maybe it's not so good, because our product does feed a lot of people globally.
On the carbon tax part of your question, that is one area that the government needs to reconsider, especially for farmers. Bill C-234—speaking of sticks from Tyler's earlier comments—would alleviate the stick on farmers.
My suggestion here is that this is coming up again in the House on October 26. Bill C-234, in its original form, is our preferred approach. However, the reality of the situation—and without much faith in the Senate—is that we would encourage the amended Bill C-234 to go through immediately. It won't help as many farmers, but it will help farmers in need right now, and we need an early harvest for those farmers to get some tax relief.
The emissions are not going down because farmers do not have any alternative, and it becomes a straight-up tax. This stick is just acting on farmers as a club, and they can't do anything about it except take it on the chin and reduce their bottom line.
Please get Bill C-234passed and get some relief to those farmers. Lots of those farmers are feeling the brunt of China right now, and they're going to feel a lot more of it in the next six months.