I'll just elaborate a bit on that. Thank you.
When it comes to the farmers, they have no way to pass along the costs of these things. They don't have any alternative energy they can move to. A tax, theoretically, would work if you had alternatives and were trying to change their behaviour. They just don't have available to them the technology to switch from the more fossil fuel-based system they have right now. Without an alternative for their energy needs, they just have to pay the tax, and emissions are not, respectfully, going to move, because they're going to continue to do what they need to do to farm the crops and grow their crops.
They are sustainable. They have cut their emissions and softened their environmental footprint a lot, especially in canola production, which has gone to zero-till and high-tech—everything that they can do—but if they have to dry their grain—